The end of its TALON database on antiwar activists may signal more emphasis on civil liberties.

Christian Science Monitor

First came the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s decision in the spring to implement stringent new guidelines to prevent agents from abusing their authority to issue national security letters, which can be used to gather information about Americans without their knowledge. Then in Congress, lawmakers voiced concern that the wiretapping authority they granted the Justice Department this summer may be too broad and needs to be revisited.

While many security experts argue that the amorphous nature of the terrorist threat demands a comprehensive response, they also question the advisability of casting a wide net that infringes on Americans’ privacy rights.

“There’s clear evidence of abuse and that the pendulum has shifted too far in terms of eroding civil liberties, so these are all hopeful signs,” says Matthew Robinson, professor of criminal justice at Appalachian State University in Boone, N.C. “But I think the pendulum has farther to swing, and [civil liberties may be eroded further] until some courageous leader comes forward and says, ‘Enough.’”   Read full story